IMPRISONED WITHOUT DUE PROCESS FOR

Correspondence with the Bush Administration

U.S. transfers 20 more prisoners to Afghan custody
Reuters
February 10, 2008
Confusion Clouds Guantanamo Tribunals
Associated Press
February 6, 2008
France urges US to drop Guantanamo trial of Canadian
AFP
January 23, 2008
More Media...

Supreme Court Decisions
  - RASUL v. Bush & Al-Odah v. United States
  - HAMDI et al. v. RUMSFELD
  - HAMDAN et al. v. RUMSFELD

Amicus Briefs
  - Helen Duffy and William Aceves

 

 

<< Back

Guantanamo Bay detainees' Lawyers Oppose Government Request for More Legal Filings

Toni Locy
Associated Press
July 3, 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) - Attorneys representing hundreds of GuantanamoBay detainees urged a federal appeals court Monday to reject a Bush administration request for more legal filings in light of last week's Supreme Court ruling in the case of Osama bin Laden's driver.

The detainees' lawyers said a three-judge panel has had three rounds of legal filings already and does not need more briefing to decide the fate of lawsuits that challenge the legality of the prisoners' detentions.

Solicitor General Paul Clement asked the panel for the opportunity to explain how the administration views the high court's decision immediately after justices ruled Thursday in the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan.

Attorneys for the detainees said the Hamdan decision "speaks with perfect clarity," and granting the administration's request "would cause further unwarranted delay ... seriously prejudicing the Guantanamo detainees," most of whom "languish in their fifth year of imprisonment without being charged with any wrongdoing."

Last week, the Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, rebuked President Bush, ruling that his plan to hold criminal trials before military tribunals for some of the Guantanamo detainees violates U.S. and international law.

In a significant part of the ruling, justices also said a law passed by Congress late last year to limit lawsuits filed by Guantanamo detainees does not apply to pending cases like Hamdan's. By the time the law was passed in December, civil cases had been filed on behalf of hundreds of detainees.

In 2004, the Supreme Court said detainees can challenge the legality of their detentions. Congress passed the Detainee Treatment Act to limit those lawsuits and to set up a process for detainees to challenge their designations as "enemy combatants."

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has heard arguments twice -- in September 2005 and in March -- in appeals filed both by the government and on behalf of the detainees challenging conflicting rulings by trial judges on whether the lawsuits can proceed.

<< Back